InstantForum.NET v2.9.0SQLServerCentralhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/notifications@sqlservercentral.comSat, 18 May 2013 13:04:48 GMT20http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]SQLRNNR (5/15/2013)[/b][hr]The Windows 7 interface is sort of there under the covers. You can switch back and forth. That aside, there are some quirks with Windows 8 (like the switching back and forth) that makes it unattractive to me.There were also some software compatibility issues and driver issues that I have seen.I have no desire to use the swipe or touch for a work laptop and to make this OS work well you need touch.[/quote]I don't find I have to switch back and forth much. Of course I'm happy to use windows+R to run things rather than hunt through a menu (whether the windows 8 start screen or the older text menus) and I have things I use a lot pinned to taskbar anyway.I don't want to use touch either, but the OS works just fine for me with a mouse. In fact I hate tracker balls and the touch pads that almost all laptops incorporate as much as I hate touch screens - although I can work with any of them (including touch screens) I avoid them in favour of using a mouse whenever possible (a mouse is kind of hard when the laptop is on my lap, so it's not always possible).Fri, 17 May 2013 15:10:23 GMTL' Eomot Inverséhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]jasona.work (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]And we have another winner:[quote]After the date was changed to 2032 , scheduled jobs did run no issues. After changing the date to 2013 it doesn't .How to check the next schedule? [/quote] Really, you don't know how to check your jobs with Job Activity Monitor? Maybe it is a good thing I am going to an actual desert soon.[/quote]OMG:[quote]Yes the next run is scheduled to 2032. How can I change things back to normal. [/quote][/quote]Start -> Run -> CMD -> date -> 01-01-2032 ?:-D[/quote]Unfortunately member servers in a domain take their time from the DC and the DCs will often take their time from a external time server, so only works for a little while.But, you could put that into a job and run it every 10 minutes starting now.Fri, 17 May 2013 12:01:41 GMTGilaMonsterhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]And we have another winner:[quote]After the date was changed to 2032 , scheduled jobs did run no issues. After changing the date to 2013 it doesn't .How to check the next schedule? [/quote] Really, you don't know how to check your jobs with Job Activity Monitor? Maybe it is a good thing I am going to an actual desert soon.[/quote]OMG:[quote]Yes the next run is scheduled to 2032. How can I change things back to normal. [/quote][/quote]Start -> Run -> CMD -> date -> 01-01-2032 ?:-DFri, 17 May 2013 11:56:03 GMTjasona.workhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Grant Fritchey (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]GilaMonster (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]"I know the drawbacks of nolock, in our case it cannot be avoided"Hmm...[/quote]And we have a really good reason to not run backups, to have the database in simple recovery, to never test the backups that we do run, and yeah, I can justify that 150 column heap table that is called by every query in the system...[/quote]Good, good. Carry on then.:-DFri, 17 May 2013 11:51:28 GMTGilaMonsterhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]And we have another winner:[quote]After the date was changed to 2032 , scheduled jobs did run no issues. After changing the date to 2013 it doesn't .How to check the next schedule? [/quote] Really, you don't know how to check your jobs with Job Activity Monitor? Maybe it is a good thing I am going to an actual desert soon.[/quote]OMG:[quote]Yes the next run is scheduled to 2032. How can I change things back to normal. [/quote][/quote]Perhaps it's time for them to invoke the Alternate Reality/Timewarp sp.:hehe:Fri, 17 May 2013 11:48:02 GMTdburseyhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Stefan Krzywicki (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]And we have another winner:[quote]After the date was changed to 2032 , scheduled jobs did run no issues. After changing the date to 2013 it doesn't .How to check the next schedule? [/quote] Really, you don't know how to check your jobs with Job Activity Monitor? Maybe it is a good thing I am going to an actual desert soon.[/quote]OMG:[quote]Yes the next run is scheduled to 2032. How can I change things back to normal. [/quote][/quote]Wait 19 years[/quote]RotFL :hehe: :hehe:Fri, 17 May 2013 11:45:39 GMTGilaMonsterhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]And we have another winner:[quote]After the date was changed to 2032 , scheduled jobs did run no issues. After changing the date to 2013 it doesn't .How to check the next schedule? [/quote] Really, you don't know how to check your jobs with Job Activity Monitor? Maybe it is a good thing I am going to an actual desert soon.[/quote]OMG:[quote]Yes the next run is scheduled to 2032. How can I change things back to normal. [/quote][/quote]Wait 19 yearsFri, 17 May 2013 11:40:18 GMTStefan Krzywickihttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]And we have another winner:[quote]After the date was changed to 2032 , scheduled jobs did run no issues. After changing the date to 2013 it doesn't .How to check the next schedule? [/quote] Really, you don't know how to check your jobs with Job Activity Monitor? Maybe it is a good thing I am going to an actual desert soon.[/quote]OMG:[quote]Yes the next run is scheduled to 2032. How can I change things back to normal. [/quote]Fri, 17 May 2013 11:22:57 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxAnd we have another winner:[quote]After the date was changed to 2032 , scheduled jobs did run no issues. After changing the date to 2013 it doesn't .How to check the next schedule? [/quote] Really, you don't know how to check your jobs with Job Activity Monitor? Maybe it is a good thing I am going to an actual desert soon.Fri, 17 May 2013 11:13:03 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]GilaMonster (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]"I know the drawbacks of nolock, in our case it cannot be avoided"Hmm...[/quote]And we have a really good reason to not run backups, to have the database in simple recovery, to never test the backups that we do run, and yeah, I can justify that 150 column heap table that is called by every query in the system...Fri, 17 May 2013 10:54:22 GMTGrant Fritcheyhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]patrickmcginnis59 10839 (5/15/2013)[/b][hr][quote]Now can someone tell me what all the fuss is about? Please?[/quote]Not a big web user eh? Its not like people haven't been discussing this to death.[/quote]I'm not really sure how I should react to that. People have indeed been discussing it to death. It appears to me to have been a discussion with much heat, little light, and far too much blind resistance to change. I suspect that having first played with computers in the early 60s and having worked with them since the mid-60s that I've both seen rather more changes in software (and hardware, of course) than most of the people participating in the discussion and have a lot more chance of distinguishing bad change from good change. That's the polite reaction to your arrogant and ignorant condescension, I won't treat you to the alternative version.[quote].....I think you can dismiss the significant proportion of detractors however you like, but you'll have a hard time convincing me that there aren't real issues with this release.[/quote]There probably are some real issues, but not enough to justify the volume of vituperation of windows 8 that is being spouted out there. When was the last time MS (or IBM, or Apple, or Adobe, or anyone else in the software business) made a big release that had absolutely no real issues?Fri, 17 May 2013 10:39:29 GMTL' Eomot Inverséhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]Is that from the same person who thinks that NOLOCK makes queries run faster?[/quote]Which one of them?Fri, 17 May 2013 09:27:28 GMTGilaMonsterhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]GilaMonster (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]"I know the drawbacks of nolock, in our case it cannot be avoided"Hmm...[/quote]Hmm, recall seeing that somewhere before....Is that from the same person who thinks that NOLOCK makes queries run faster?[/quote]You're going to have to be more specific. I have 20 of those in my immediate workplace. Maybe more.Fri, 17 May 2013 09:20:42 GMTBrandie Tarvinhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]GilaMonster (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]"I know the drawbacks of nolock, in our case it cannot be avoided"Hmm...[/quote]Hmm, recall seeing that somewhere before....Is that from the same person who thinks that NOLOCK makes queries run faster?Fri, 17 May 2013 08:33:24 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]jcrawf02 (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Second PM:[quote]no, they derail my posts. The post is first and foremost for me, secondly for all others having same problem.[/quote][/quote]The post is for him?That makes it sound like he doesn't want anyone to answer, that he's just posting to see himself type.That's the way I'm reading that.[/quote]naw, he's saying he needs help first, screw the other people, they can figure it out later on their own.Lynn should change his post to:"EDITED: removed solution at the request of the OP, if you are having the same issues and want to know how to fix it, please contact OP to find out what they did"[/quote]Actually had a couple of constructive PMs yesterday. I woke up to this one:[quote]You are like my new little brother. I have to take you everywhere fun I want to go. See you next topic![/quote]Think I may be forgiven for perceived past transgressions?Fri, 17 May 2013 08:31:53 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]GilaMonster (5/17/2013)[/b][hr]"I know the drawbacks of nolock, in our case it cannot be avoided"Hmm...[/quote]Probably doesn't wear a seatbelt on the autobahn either. :-PFri, 17 May 2013 07:32:14 GMTSean Langehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx"I know the drawbacks of nolock, in our case it cannot be avoided"Hmm...Fri, 17 May 2013 07:24:57 GMTGilaMonsterhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/17/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Second PM:[quote]no, they derail my posts. The post is first and foremost for me, secondly for all others having same problem.[/quote][/quote]The post is for him?That makes it sound like he doesn't want anyone to answer, that he's just posting to see himself type.That's the way I'm reading that.[/quote]naw, he's saying he needs help first, screw the other people, they can figure it out later on their own.Lynn should change his post to:"EDITED: removed solution at the request of the OP, if you are having the same issues and want to know how to fix it, please contact OP to find out what they did"Fri, 17 May 2013 07:09:15 GMTjcrawf02http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Second PM:[quote]no, they derail my posts. The post is first and foremost for me, secondly for all others having same problem.[/quote][/quote]The post is for him?That makes it sound like he doesn't want anyone to answer, that he's just posting to see himself type.That's the way I'm reading that.Fri, 17 May 2013 04:51:30 GMTBrandie Tarvinhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]jasona.work (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]With an announcement from the Oracle DBA I work with, I now know what the people I used to work with felt like when I announced I was leaving...Worse, he's leaving half-way through my vacation, leaving a very novice guy in charge of both MS SQL and Oracle...Oh boy...[/quote]Sounds like fun when you get back from vacation. ;-)[/quote]Just a demonstration of the Murphy's Law, nothing more. :-)edit: an overlooked typoThu, 16 May 2013 19:40:05 GMTRevenanthttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]jasona.work (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]With an announcement from the Oracle DBA I work with, I now know what the people I used to work with felt like when I announced I was leaving...Worse, he's leaving half-way through my vacation, leaving a very novice guy in charge of both MS SQL and Oracle...Oh boy...[/quote]Sounds like fun when you get back from vacation. ;-)Thu, 16 May 2013 16:34:03 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxWith an announcement from the Oracle DBA I work with, I now know what the people I used to work with felt like when I announced I was leaving...Worse, he's leaving half-way through my vacation, leaving a very novice guy in charge of both MS SQL and Oracle...Oh boy...Thu, 16 May 2013 15:55:02 GMTjasona.workhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]OK.... so what are the parameters for DBCC TIMEWARP in SQL 2005 again? I"m about to derive to a point and disappear from this conversation.[/quote]Don't do that, we've missed you. Honestly, it has been a while since you visited us here.Thu, 16 May 2013 15:14:17 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxOK.... so what are the parameters for DBCC TIMEWARP in SQL 2005 again? I"m about to derive to a point and disappear from this conversation.Thu, 16 May 2013 14:54:40 GMTThe Dixie Flatlinehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]WayneS (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b] Chad Crawford (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Not to mention alternate universes.[/quote]But you just did.[/quote]Darn those picky details...[/quote]But I only mentioned it (that I know of) in [i]this [/i] universe. What ARID (alternate reality identification) are you using? Is it the same one that has St. Lynn is going over to the dark side?[/quote]Guys, guys. Didn't you know the ARID in SQL Server is broken?The SQL Server team at Microsoft attempted to update the DBCC Timewarp Paradox constraint in this latest round of updates, but forgot to check their math. They copied-n-pasted cells from Excel that were hidden (but should have been deleted) which caused [url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/15/us/nasa-kepler]Kepler to go into safe mode[/url]. Now the whole equation is kibbits and ARID is giving results based off alternating Stardates.There's like a whole future KB article about it that I can't link to because the Paradox constraint is still busted.[/quote]I thought PARADOX was a Borland product, competitive to SQL Server. It is in my ARID anyway, just like Excel. Microsoft should have imported the data from Excel to Quattro first.[/quote]No, no, no, PARADOX of Borlands answer to Access. InterBase was Borlands competitor to SQL Server.[/quote]Oh no, PARADOX pre-dated Access. Paradox is where I started as a developer. Then, after Access 2.0, they ported to windows and we got the most lovely programming language on earth (not), OPAL, Object Paradox Application Language. WOOF! What a dog.Thu, 16 May 2013 14:41:05 GMTGrant Fritcheyhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]WayneS (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b] Chad Crawford (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Not to mention alternate universes.[/quote]But you just did.[/quote]Darn those picky details...[/quote]But I only mentioned it (that I know of) in [i]this [/i] universe. What ARID (alternate reality identification) are you using? Is it the same one that has St. Lynn is going over to the dark side?[/quote]Guys, guys. Didn't you know the ARID in SQL Server is broken?The SQL Server team at Microsoft attempted to update the DBCC Timewarp Paradox constraint in this latest round of updates, but forgot to check their math. They copied-n-pasted cells from Excel that were hidden (but should have been deleted) which caused [url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/15/us/nasa-kepler]Kepler to go into safe mode[/url]. Now the whole equation is kibbits and ARID is giving results based off alternating Stardates.There's like a whole future KB article about it that I can't link to because the Paradox constraint is still busted.[/quote]I thought PARADOX was a Borland product, competitive to SQL Server. It is in my ARID anyway, just like Excel. Microsoft should have imported the data from Excel to Quattro first.[/quote]No, no, no, PARADOX of Borlands answer to Access. InterBase was Borlands competitor to SQL Server.Thu, 16 May 2013 13:54:02 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]WayneS (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b] Chad Crawford (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Not to mention alternate universes.[/quote]But you just did.[/quote]Darn those picky details...[/quote]But I only mentioned it (that I know of) in [i]this [/i] universe. What ARID (alternate reality identification) are you using? Is it the same one that has St. Lynn is going over to the dark side?[/quote]Guys, guys. Didn't you know the ARID in SQL Server is broken?The SQL Server team at Microsoft attempted to update the DBCC Timewarp Paradox constraint in this latest round of updates, but forgot to check their math. They copied-n-pasted cells from Excel that were hidden (but should have been deleted) which caused [url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/15/us/nasa-kepler]Kepler to go into safe mode[/url]. Now the whole equation is kibbits and ARID is giving results based off alternating Stardates.There's like a whole future KB article about it that I can't link to because the Paradox constraint is still busted.[/quote]I thought PARADOX was a Borland product, competitive to SQL Server. It is in my ARID anyway, just like Excel. Microsoft should have imported the data from Excel to Quattro first.Thu, 16 May 2013 13:51:06 GMTThe Dixie Flatlinehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote]no, they derail my posts. The post is first and foremost for me, secondly for all others having same problem.[/quote][/quote]Yeah, Lynn, this is why we allow the original poster to moderate the responses . . . oh, yeah, we DON'T do that. :-DThu, 16 May 2013 13:22:53 GMTwolfkilljhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]WayneS (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b] Chad Crawford (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Not to mention alternate universes.[/quote]But you just did.[/quote]Darn those picky details...[/quote]But I only mentioned it (that I know of) in [i]this [/i] universe. What ARID (alternate reality identification) are you using? Is it the same one that has St. Lynn is going over to the dark side?[/quote]Guys, guys. Didn't you know the ARID in SQL Server is broken?The SQL Server team at Microsoft attempted to update the DBCC Timewarp Paradox constraint in this latest round of updates, but forgot to check their math. They copied-n-pasted cells from Excel that were hidden (but should have been deleted) which caused [url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/15/us/nasa-kepler]Kepler to go into safe mode[/url]. Now the whole equation is kibbits and ARID is giving results based off alternating Stardates.There's like a whole future KB article about it that I can't link to because the Paradox constraint is still busted.[/quote]Under certain conditions, the built-in ARID methods can get stuck in infinite loops, causing the spacetime engine to spin off a steady stream of branched ARs until an out-of-range error for the ARID value terminates the batch. Unfortunately, to fix this, you have to track down the affected SQL Server instance in ALL AR branches and apply a hotfix at the moment each branch was created. This requires you to execute DBCC TIMEWARP from an instance of SQL Server 2005 (the last version not affected by this bug). If you don't have a 2005 instance handy, you can attempt the undocumented Bill and Ted method of creating one: "Remember to provision and install a SQL Server 2005 instance."Thu, 16 May 2013 13:20:36 GMTwolfkilljhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]SQLRNNR (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Oops, I just replied on a thread started by someone who has asked me NOT to that. Guess that tarnishes my halo more.[/quote]Wait. There's a thread where someone specifically asked you not to reply?[/quote]And obviously Lynn has a hard time listening to the OP - hehe[/quote]Obviously. He just PMed me to remind me that he asked me not to visit his threads. Had to tell him sorry but I don't look at who posted, I just look at the question. Told him all he needed to do was ignore me. My posts could prove helpful to others even if he wants to ignore me.[/quote]First PM:[quote]kindly to not visit my forums. I'm sure you have bigger fish to fry. I just need some genuine help.[/quote]My Response:[quote]Sorry, but I don't usually look at who posted the question, I just look at the question.To be honest, you really should not sweat the small stuff. All you have to do is just ignore me. My posts on your threads may help others even if you don't want to hear what I have to say.[/quote]Second PM:[quote]no, they derail my posts. The post is first and foremost for me, secondly for all others having same problem.[/quote]I'm just dropping it at this point.Thu, 16 May 2013 12:59:21 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]SQLRNNR (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Oops, I just replied on a thread started by someone who has asked me NOT to that. Guess that tarnishes my halo more.[/quote]Wait. There's a thread where someone specifically asked you not to reply?[/quote]And obviously Lynn has a hard time listening to the OP - hehe[/quote]Obviously. He just PMed me to remind me that he asked me not to visit his threads. Had to tell him sorry but I don't look at who posted, I just look at the question. Told him all he needed to do was ignore me. My posts could prove helpful to others even if he wants to ignore me.Thu, 16 May 2013 12:52:51 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]WayneS (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b] Chad Crawford (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Not to mention alternate universes.[/quote]But you just did.[/quote]Darn those picky details...[/quote]But I only mentioned it (that I know of) in [i]this [/i] universe. What ARID (alternate reality identification) are you using? Is it the same one that has St. Lynn is going over to the dark side?[/quote]Guys, guys. Didn't you know the ARID in SQL Server is broken?The SQL Server team at Microsoft attempted to update the DBCC Timewarp Paradox constraint in this latest round of updates, but forgot to check their math. They copied-n-pasted cells from Excel that were hidden (but should have been deleted) which caused [url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/15/us/nasa-kepler]Kepler to go into safe mode[/url]. Now the whole equation is kibbits and ARID is giving results based off alternating Stardates.There's like a whole future KB article about it that I can't link to because the Paradox constraint is still busted.Thu, 16 May 2013 12:29:08 GMTBrandie Tarvinhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]WayneS (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b] Chad Crawford (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]The Dixie Flatline (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Not to mention alternate universes.[/quote]But you just did.[/quote]Darn those picky details...[/quote]But I only mentioned it (that I know of) in [i]this [/i] universe. What ARID (alternate reality identification) are you using? Is it the same one that has St. Lynn is going over to the dark side?Thu, 16 May 2013 12:15:38 GMTThe Dixie Flatlinehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Brandie Tarvin (5/16/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Oops, I just replied on a thread started by someone who has asked me NOT to that. Guess that tarnishes my halo more.[/quote]Wait. There's a thread where someone specifically asked you not to reply?[/quote]And obviously Lynn has a hard time listening to the OP - heheThu, 16 May 2013 11:58:30 GMTSQLRNNRhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspx[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (5/16/2013)[/b][hr]Oops, I just replied on a thread started by someone who has asked me NOT to that. Guess that tarnishes my halo more.[/quote]Wait. There's a thread where someone specifically asked you not to reply?Thu, 16 May 2013 11:49:15 GMTBrandie Tarvinhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxOops, I just replied on a thread started by someone who has asked me NOT to that. Guess that tarnishes my halo more.Thu, 16 May 2013 11:15:36 GMTLynn Pettishttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxI'm still waiting on last weeks friday!Thu, 16 May 2013 11:01:22 GMTpatrickmcginnis59 10839http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxIt is Friday for me. :-P I am out tomorrow for field day at the kid's school.Thu, 16 May 2013 10:56:23 GMTSean Langehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxI'm wearing a Friday shirt.Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:53 GMTGrant Fritcheyhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic604325-61-1.aspxI vote in favor of it being Friday.Thu, 16 May 2013 10:47:04 GMTSQLRNNR