﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / SQL Server 2008 / T-SQL (SS2K8)  / Sql Server Snaphot Performance. / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:11:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Sql Server Snaphot Performance.</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1374222-392-1.aspx</link><description>Thanks very much for your help. Thats exactly what I needed.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 03:56:08 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>ggjjbb1983</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sql Server Snaphot Performance.</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1374222-392-1.aspx</link><description>Yup, it can be due to the snapshot.[url]http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Performance+Tuning/64080/[/url]</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 03:40:39 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>GilaMonster</dc:creator></item><item><title>Sql Server Snaphot Performance.</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1374222-392-1.aspx</link><description>Hi,I am running an update to a large number of rows on a table in a database which has a snapshot. The update is quite slow, so I was just wondering if having a snaphot in place will slow down updates at all, as the original pages will need to be copied to the snapshot for each modification?It may just be due to the large amount of  data; however I'd like to rule out the possibiltiy that the update is not being slowed down by the snaphot being in place.Thanks.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 03:34:44 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>ggjjbb1983</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>