﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / SQL Server 2008 / SQL Server 2008 - General  / Sharepoint SQL Server / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:23:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>[quote]Configuration storage and IOPS....Transaction logs for the Configuration database can be large, therefore we recommend that you change the recovery model for the database from full to simple. [/quote]School project?</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:53:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Sergiy</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Lynn Pettis (3/11/2013)[/b][hr][quote][b]GilaMonster (3/11/2013)[/b][hr]Communication? What a novel idea!The sharepoint DB needs a complete redesign first, and to be honest, that's not going to happen.[/quote]Same could be said ot their CRM product as well.[/quote]Wasn't that bought rather than developed inhouse?</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:34:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>GilaMonster</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]GilaMonster (3/11/2013)[/b][hr]Communication? What a novel idea!The sharepoint DB needs a complete redesign first, and to be honest, that's not going to happen.[/quote]Same could be said ot their CRM product as well.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:13:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Lynn Pettis</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>Communication? What a novel idea!The sharepoint DB needs a complete redesign first, and to be honest, that's not going to happen.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:10:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>GilaMonster</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>Microsoft SharePoint team needs to communicate with SQL Server team, vice versus. Parallelism is a good feature to use, not to surppess.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:24:02 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>jswong05</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>The sharepoint database design is pretty bad (very bad), and about the only way to make the queries work acceptably is to force maxdop 1.</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 15:29:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>GilaMonster</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>with microsoft products that use SQL server as a backend they often don't follow their own best practices :-)the code as written must work better if parallelism is suppressed, seems a shame and I don't know why, one can only hope they have thoroughly tested and proved it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:45:10 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>george sibbald</dc:creator></item><item><title>Sharepoint SQL Server</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1428927-391-1.aspx</link><description>http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc298801.aspx•To ensure optimal performance, we strongly recommend that you set max degree of parallelism (MAXDOP) to 1 SQL Server instances that host SharePoint Server 2010 databases? can someone explain why sharepoint team put this document with the above line? Sharepoint surpresses all parallelism?</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:24:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>jswong05</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>