﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Database Design / Hardware  / Suggest RAID arrays for minimal single server? / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:54:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Suggest RAID arrays for minimal single server?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1411273-377-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]ipgsql (1/24/2013)[/b][hr]Hi,Looking for some opinions/links. If a SQL server (OLTP) is restricted to a single box with max 8 drives, would four RAID1 arrays (OS,TEMPDB,LOGS,DATA) be the way to go?Or a RAID1 for OS and a 6 disk RAID10 for the rest?Or RAID1 OS, RAID1 TEMPDB, RAID10 for the rest?Thanks[/quote]The first item to separate wpuld be the transaction logs. So more like thisRAID1 OS, RAID1 LOGS, RAID10 for the rest</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:58:13 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Perry Whittle</dc:creator></item><item><title>Suggest RAID arrays for minimal single server?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1411273-377-1.aspx</link><description>Hi,Looking for some opinions/links. If a SQL server (OLTP) is restricted to a single box with max 8 drives, would four RAID1 arrays (OS,TEMPDB,LOGS,DATA) be the way to go?Or a RAID1 for OS and a 6 disk RAID10 for the rest?Or RAID1 OS, RAID1 TEMPDB, RAID10 for the rest?Thanks</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:15:04 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>ipgsql</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>