﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Database Design / Hardware  / Found ideal block size with SQLIO, what now? / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:59:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Found ideal block size with SQLIO, what now?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1211348-377-1.aspx</link><description>Also, Depending on the size of the disk you may want to consider using GPT over MBR.</description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:35:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Perry Whittle</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Found ideal block size with SQLIO, what now?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1211348-377-1.aspx</link><description>As far as I know you need to reformat the disk.</description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:53:29 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>opc.three</dc:creator></item><item><title>Found ideal block size with SQLIO, what now?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1211348-377-1.aspx</link><description>Lets say ive run extensive tests with SQLIO and found for my particular workload the ideal blocksize is 64kb.I ran the command [i]fsutil fsinfo ntfsinfo T: [/i] and can see the drive currently has a cluster size of 4kb.Should i now reformat the drive with a cluster size of 64kb?Im pretty sure thats what i do, but i just want to be certain.</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:06:15 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>winston Smith</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>