﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Database Design / Hardware  / 2 OS Servers - 2Apps and SQL Server 2008 / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:06:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>2 OS Servers - 2Apps and SQL Server 2008</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1021195-377-1.aspx</link><description>i have to figure out the best configuration for 2 Servers - identical to each other1. SQL Server 20082. Cold Fusion for Intranet website3. 3rd Party BI (not ssrs or ssas) tool with integrated web#3 suggests that it should have it's own server, and if you put #3 on the same server as #2, you have a conflict on port 80, so you would need to do a bit of configuration  to get them to work togetherso given #1 and #3 have best practices to run on their own server, where should I put #2 the cold fusion??? does anyone know if cold fusion is a memory hog or it's affect of putting cold fusion on the same box as sql server.thanks in advance</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:23:32 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>nawillia</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>