InstantForum.NET v2.9.0SQLServerCentralhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/notifications@sqlservercentral.comWed, 22 May 2013 14:30:55 GMT20http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1433948-364-1.aspxT-SQL process checking a table.Thanks so much for your response!Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:29:32 GMTDaveDBhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1433948-364-1.aspxFrom a T-SQL perspective WAITFOR DELAY will not actively use any server resources other than the overhead of having it keep an open thread using a little memory for the request and having it effectively do nothing.From an SSIS perspective, if it issued the T-SQL batch out of a Script Task then the SSIS package will remain running. So again, it won't be actively using CPU or doing I/O, but it will be occupying memory on your server.PS I am confused though. You say that you check a [i]folder[/i] every 15 minutes but then you show a SQL batch. Are we talking about an SSIS Package checking a folder or a T-SQL process checking table?Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:38:03 GMTopc.threehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1433948-364-1.aspxHello,I have a SSIS package that pulls files down from an FTP site and loads the files into basic SQL tables. At the moment this package runs everyday at 3:00pm. I have to check the folder to see if a specific file was uploaded to determine when the FTP upload process ends. Currently I have a simple timer script set up that checks the folder every 15 minutes to see if the file has been uploaded. My question is... How resource intensive is this method? If the file doesn't upload for several hours will this kill performance on my production box? Here is the script that I have in a SSIS scripting task... WHILE (select count(*) from TABLE where DATE >= GETDATE()) = 0 BEGIN WAITFOR DELAY '00:15:00' END;Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:59:45 GMTDaveDB