﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Discuss Content Posted by Brian Knight / Article Discussions / Article Discussions by Author  / Using Views and Synonyms for Abstraction / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:30:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Using Views and Synonyms for Abstraction</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic608993-31-1.aspx</link><description>Brian,Interesting video.  I work in a system where we don't use views because only the lead developer and myself (the DBA) directly access the database.  Would there be any need for views or synonyms in a small organization such as that?One other question on your video - you mention '3 part syntax' and '4 part syntax'.  I have never heard that terminology before.  What do you mean by that?Thanks!Maurine Lee</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:07:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>maurine</dc:creator></item><item><title>Using Views and Synonyms for Abstraction</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic608993-31-1.aspx</link><description>Comments posted to this topic are about the item [B]&lt;A HREF="/articles/Video/65077/"&gt;Using Views and Synonyms for Abstraction&lt;/A&gt;[/B]</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:40:23 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Brian Knight</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>