InstantForum.NET v2.9.0SQLServerCentralhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/notifications@sqlservercentral.comWed, 19 Jun 2013 13:58:28 GMT20http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic5590-31-1.aspxBrian,Generally good review - but this point is no longer true as of 10/2003"Viewing the transaction log (only product on the market that can do that) "There is another product on the market that can do this LockwoodTech Log Navigator - http://www.lockwoodtech.com/index_lognavigator.htm Log Navigator currently supports data change audits only but support for DDL and Select auditing is planned soon.Brian LockwoodLockwoodTech Software - value added SQL toolshttp://www.lockwoodtech.comWed, 05 Nov 2003 09:27:00 GMTBrian Lockwoodhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic5590-31-1.aspxThanks for the comments Ron. I too tried to "break" the program as best I could and couldn't do it <img src=icon_smile_cool.gif border=0 align=middle>. It seemed that in most cases of a breakage it was a user problem like loading orphaned records in. I tend to agree that the interface needed some work in the area you mentioned but I wonder if it's more of a technical reason versus an interface reason why that couldn't do that.Brian Knightbknight@sqlservercentral.comhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/bknightTue, 23 Jul 2002 07:00:00 GMTBrian Knighthttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic5590-31-1.aspxCouldn't agree with Brian more. This is a great product! Great review!DavidTue, 23 Jul 2002 06:54:00 GMTDavid Benoithttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic5590-31-1.aspxI agree this is a great tool. We ran a lot of tests and simulated several disasters, all of which we recovered from. The interface is not entirely intuitive. For example, the only way I found to rollback a single transaction was to right click on the transaction.Brian points out that foreign keys might have to be dropped when restoring information. To that I would add that you might need to disable triggers to properly restore the data. Small potatoes considering the value of the recovery but should be kept in mind anyway. Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:49:00 GMTRonKylehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic5590-31-1.aspxComments posted to this topic are about the content posted at <A HREF=http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/bknight/lumigentlogexplorer3.asp>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/bknight/lumigentlogexplorer3.asp</A>Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:00:00 GMTBrian Knight