﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Article Discussions / Article Discussions by Author / Discuss content posted by Omeswar Danwada  / Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:48:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Alvin Ramard (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]No, I do not remember.  I seem to remember that an MVP involved in the discussion did report him to those administering the MS MVP process.[/quote]And rightly so. Thanks for getting back to me - I have just seen a few guys who, to me, have never seemed to deserve the MVP status because they write a lot, but not a lot of accurate, if you see what I mean. Just wondered if they were one and the same...</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:54:04 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Matt Whitfield</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Matt Whitfield (9/13/2010)[/b][hr][quote][b]Alvin Ramard (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]It's surprising how much plagiarism actually takes place.  A discussion here on SSC a while back that started with something along the line of "this person just plagiarised one of my blog postings." ended up with the discovery that many, if not all, of this MS MVP's blog postings were word for word copies of somebody else's blogs.I wonder if his MVP status has been revoke yet.[/quote]AlvinI don't suppose you remember who that was do you?M[/quote]No, I do not remember.  I seem to remember that an MVP involved in the discussion did report him to those administering the MS MVP process.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:44:02 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Alvin Ramard</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Alvin Ramard (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]It's surprising how much plagiarism actually takes place.  A discussion here on SSC a while back that started with something along the line of "this person just plagiarised one of my blog postings." ended up with the discovery that many, if not all, of this MS MVP's blog postings were word for word copies of somebody else's blogs.I wonder if his MVP status has been revoke yet.[/quote]AlvinI don't suppose you remember who that was do you?M</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:25:04 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Matt Whitfield</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>I was fortunate enough to hear Thomas Kesjner at SQL Bits in London earlier this year.He started his presentation with "I'm not normally a transactional specialist but....." and proceeded to demonstrate that in performance terms it would be like a runner saying "sprinting isn't my thing" just before running a 6 second 100m.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:18:42 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>David.Poole</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>It is a shame that this is plagiarized work as there's a comment I'd like to make about the article and I don't see a way to comment on the original.[i]•If Integration Services and SQL Server run on the same server, use the SQL Server destination instead of the OLE DB destination to improve performance.[/i]This is not the case on Windows Server 2008. SQL Server destination doesn't work on that OS.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:54:50 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Stefan Krzywicki</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>Aside from the copy &amp; paste, the article is excellent.  Although I think I wouldn't call it a best practices article as much as calling it something Optimizing your SSIS Packages.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:46:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Daniel Bowlin</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Alvin Ramard (9/13/2010)[/b][hr][quote][b]amenjonathan (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]I am thoroughly shocked someone would even think about plagerising at that level. It's almost comical. I've never seen such blatant plagerism, and in a submission to a professional publication at that! (or however SQLServerCentral.com is classified)Just wow!Only thing I can say is thanks for bringing this article to light. First time I've read it. Great job to the actual authors![/quote]It's surprising how much plagiarism actually takes place.  A discussion here on SSC a while back that started with something along the line of "this person just plagiarised one of my blog postings." ended up with the discovery that many, if not all, of this MS MVP's blog postings were word for word copies of somebody else's blogs.I wonder if his MVP status has been revoke yet.[/quote]That is just one example of many discussions we have had on the topic.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:21:01 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>SQLRNNR</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]amenjonathan (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]I am thoroughly shocked someone would even think about plagerising at that level. It's almost comical. I've never seen such blatant plagerism, and in a submission to a professional publication at that! (or however SQLServerCentral.com is classified)Just wow!Only thing I can say is thanks for bringing this article to light. First time I've read it. Great job to the actual authors![/quote]Surprising as it may be - it happens frequently.  Some have gone to the scale of plagiarizing books with only the cover picture changed.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:18:28 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>SQLRNNR</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]amenjonathan (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]I am thoroughly shocked someone would even think about plagerising at that level. It's almost comical. I've never seen such blatant plagerism, and in a submission to a professional publication at that! (or however SQLServerCentral.com is classified)Just wow!Only thing I can say is thanks for bringing this article to light. First time I've read it. Great job to the actual authors![/quote]It's surprising how much plagiarism actually takes place.  A discussion here on SSC a while back that started with something along the line of "this person just plagiarised one of my blog postings." ended up with the discovery that many, if not all, of this MS MVP's blog postings were word for word copies of somebody else's blogs.I wonder if his MVP status has been revoke yet.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:18:02 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Alvin Ramard</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Trevor R Udden (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]Odanwada - Did I miss a major citiation at the end of your article? You might want to try not blantly plagirizing others work.   The article you claim as yours was originally written by Thomas Kejser and Denny Lee, members of the SQL Customer Advisory Team, and published in 2008.  Here is a link to the original article, and a wiki link to plagiarism, in case you are un familiar with its meaning. http://sqlcat.com/top10lists/archive/2008/10/01/top-10-sql-server-integration-services-best-practices.aspxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism[/quote]Nice spot there.  I was getting excited to read this article to find a message about it being plagiarized.  Good thing it is on the SQL CAT site.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:16:32 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>SQLRNNR</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]r5d4 (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]The article has served to remind me to re-read the original.I do hope Omeswar is not going to get paid for his Copy and Paste technique.[/quote]I strongly suspect he will not.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:15:45 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>SQLRNNR</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>I am thoroughly shocked someone would even think about plagerising at that level. It's almost comical. I've never seen such blatant plagerism, and in a submission to a professional publication at that! (or however SQLServerCentral.com is classified)Just wow!Only thing I can say is thanks for bringing this article to light. First time I've read it. Great job to the actual authors!</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:27:06 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>amenjonathan</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]SanjayAttray (9/13/2010)[/b][hr][quote][b]stevefromOZ (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]can i take back my article rating somehow?[/quote]Steve, it's a pure form of plagiarism.  But, why take the rating out for article.  It's a well written article.  Perfect reading to start Monday morning.[/quote]We cannot republish something that is plagiarized. It doesn't matter how well written it is, it cannot be repeated here.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:19:34 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Steve Jones - SSC Editor</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>@Sanjay - The problem is not so much the rating as the attribution of the rating to someone who didn't do the work.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:54:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>stevefromOZ</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>My apologies for the plagiarism. I have removed the article, and reported the author to [url=http://www.osius.com/]OSI Consulting[/url], the employer whose email server was used to send the article in.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:50:15 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Steve Jones - SSC Editor</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]stevefromOZ (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]can i take back my article rating somehow?[/quote]Steve, it's a pure form of plagiarism.  But, why take the rating out for article.  It's a well written article.  Perfect reading to start Monday morning.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:14:20 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>SanjayAttray</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>can i take back my article rating somehow?</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:06:02 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>stevefromOZ</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>Nice article.  But, for Omeshwar, Nice hard work of CTRL + A, CTRL + C and CTRL + V.Nothing wrong in taking knowledge / Points from others, but there should be some changes when claiming it as your own.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:26:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>SanjayAttray</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>And they use to say immitation was the greatest form of flattery... Turns out plagiarism is the new immitation.Congrats Thomas Kejser &amp; Denny Lee on a great article!</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:19:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>marklegosz</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>I thought this article seemed very familiar..</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 06:29:09 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>steveb. </dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Trevor R Udden (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]Odanwada - Did I miss a major citiation at the end of your article? You might want to try not blantly plagirizing others work.   The article you claim as yours was originally written by Thomas Kejser and Denny Lee, members of the SQL Customer Advisory Team, and published in 2008.  Here is a link to the original article, and a wiki link to plagiarism, in case you are un familiar with its meaning. http://sqlcat.com/top10lists/archive/2008/10/01/top-10-sql-server-integration-services-best-practices.aspxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism[/quote]I don't know if anyone else has done it but thanks for pointing out the plagiarism and I've reported it to the folks at SSC.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 04:20:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeff Moden</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>The article has served to remind me to re-read the original.I do hope Omeswar is not going to get paid for his Copy and Paste technique.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:38:06 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>r5d4</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>I was going to write a post stating that it was a great article, nicely written and really helpful for my daily routines. But luckily I've read the comments first.Now I'll post a comment stating that the article is an excellent copy paste of another great article (which I didn't read yet).</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:52:37 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Koen Verbeeck</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Trevor R Udden (9/13/2010)[/b][hr]Odanwada - Did I miss a major citiation at the end of your article? You might want to try not blantly plagirizing others work.   The article you claim as yours was originally written by Thomas Kejser and Denny Lee, members of the SQL Customer Advisory Team, and published in 2008.  Here is a link to the original article, and a wiki link to plagiarism, in case you are un familiar with its meaning. http://sqlcat.com/top10lists/archive/2008/10/01/top-10-sql-server-integration-services-best-practices.aspxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism[/quote]Well spotted Trevor. Had major deja vu reading the article this morning.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 02:09:42 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>ekoner</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>Odanwada - Did I miss a major citiation at the end of your article? You might want to try not blantly plagirizing others work.   The article you claim as yours was originally written by Thomas Kejser and Denny Lee, members of the SQL Customer Advisory Team, and published in 2008.  Here is a link to the original article, and a wiki link to plagiarism, in case you are un familiar with its meaning. http://sqlcat.com/top10lists/archive/2008/10/01/top-10-sql-server-integration-services-best-practices.aspxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:03:26 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Trevor R Udden</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>I strongly suspect that 4.5 million sales transactions per [i]second [/i]requires a fair bit of pretty expensive hardware and a whole lot of parallelism.  I'm pretty sure that most installations can't do 4.5 million sales transactions per [i]minute[/i]. ;-)</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:34:12 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeff Moden</dc:creator></item><item><title>Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic984361-2786-1.aspx</link><description>Comments posted to this topic are about the item [B]&lt;A HREF="/articles/Integration+Services+(SSIS)/70995/"&gt;Top 10 SQL Server Integration Services Best Practices&lt;/A&gt;[/B]</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:55:35 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>odanwada</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>