SQLServerCentral / Article Discussions / Article Discussions by Author / Discuss content posted by Pradyothana Shastry / LogShipping / Latest Posts

RE: LogShipping

zymos — Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:35:53 GMT

That was an easy yet tricky. I revisited the Log Shipping topic to read more on it. Thanks.

RE: LogShipping

Peter Trast — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:20:22 GMT

[quote][b]Sourav-657741 (3/1/2011)[/b][hr]There is ambiguity in the question...!Copy job/other jobs can be in Monitoring server.[/quote]I think it would be the "default" location using the GUI. That's why I picked it.

RE: LogShipping

SQL-DBA-01 — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:07:58 GMT

There is ambiguity in the question...!Copy job/other jobs can be in Monitoring server.

RE: LogShipping

Peter Trast — Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:25:29 GMT

Answered this as fast as I could without hesitation and got it right. Glad my instincts were correct. I am trying to answer more questions this way to really test myself as I am starting prep for MCM, too. Good luck today, Steve, on your test!!!

RE: LogShipping

SKYBVI — Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:18:10 GMT

thanks Steve Regards,sushant

RE: LogShipping

Cliff Jones — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:19:37 GMT

[quote][b]Steve Jones - SSC Editor (2/22/2011)[/b][hr]I've reworded the answers to eliminate confusion and awarded back points to everyone up to this time.[/quote]Thanks Steve. I picked the right answer but unfortunately it wasn't as right as the most right answer.

RE: LogShipping

UMG Developer — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:02:40 GMT

Thanks for the question!

RE: LogShipping

Duncan Pryde — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:28:38 GMT

Thanks for the question

RE: LogShipping

mohammed moinudheen — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:35:27 GMT

[quote][b]Steve Jones - SSC Editor (2/22/2011)[/b][hr]I've reworded the answers to eliminate confusion and awarded back points to everyone up to this time.[/quote]Thank you Steve :-)

RE: LogShipping

Steve Jones - SSC Editor — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:28:36 GMT

I've reworded the answers to eliminate confusion and awarded back points to everyone up to this time.

RE: LogShipping

danschl — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:46:09 GMT

new the right answer but talked myself into the wrong answer thinking it was a trick question

RE: LogShipping

SQLRNNR — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:23:07 GMT

thanks for the question

RE: LogShipping

Koen Verbeeck — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:01:08 GMT

[quote][b]george sibbald (2/22/2011)[/b][hr]my other point would be the monitor can be installed on the secondary server.......:-)[/quote]Let's just conclude that the question could have been phrased better :-)

RE: LogShipping

george sibbald — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:59:59 GMT

my other point would be the monitor can be installed on the secondary server.......:-)

RE: LogShipping

Koen Verbeeck — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:52:17 GMT

[quote][b]george sibbald (2/22/2011)[/b][hr][quote][b]Koen Verbeeck (2/22/2011)[/b][hr][quote][b]mohammed moinudheen (2/21/2011)[/b][hr][b]Not in Primary[/b] should also be correct.[/quote]That is not true.Not in Primary is the same as saying: on every server that is not the primary server. [/quote]How so? Without more detail in the question Not in primary can only mean its not installed on the primary, which is a correct answer.[/quote]I understand your point.I was looking at the phrase "Not in Primary Server" from a logical (mathematically speaking) view, where you can translate "Not in Primary Server" into "Installed everywhere else".A little farfetched, but hey, I didn't have my morning cup of coffee when I posted that...

RE: LogShipping

DugyC — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:48:39 GMT

You are very true George.Maybe the OP was giving a point for peoples ability to filter out the wheat from the chaff and not be pedantic...;-)

RE: LogShipping

george sibbald — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:46:35 GMT

[quote][b]Koen Verbeeck (2/22/2011)[/b][hr][quote][b]mohammed moinudheen (2/21/2011)[/b][hr][b]Not in Primary[/b] should also be correct.[/quote]That is not true.Not in Primary is the same as saying: on every server that is not the primary server. [/quote]How so? Without more detail in the question Not in primary can only mean its not installed on the primary, which is a correct answer.

RE: LogShipping

george sibbald — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:42:18 GMT

all of these answers could be correct.

RE: LogShipping

DugyC — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:06:18 GMT

I like it when I learn something new from this, had to do a bit of reading but got there in the end. Yay!Agree regarding "Not in Primary" being the wrong answer, although worded in such a way to catch the unwary out, the fact is that the Monitor server (if employed) would not have a copy.

RE: LogShipping

Koen Verbeeck — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:10:30 GMT

[quote][b]mohammed moinudheen (2/21/2011)[/b][hr][b]Not in Primary[/b] should also be correct.[/quote]That is not true.Not in Primary is the same as saying: on every server that is not the primary server. This could include a monitor server. However, the copy job is not installed on the monitor server.Edit: it is debatable if there isn't a monitor server. But then again, if there is one obviously correct answer and another "with much doubt" correct answer, what would you choose?

RE: LogShipping

Koen Verbeeck — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:09:15 GMT

Nice easy question, thanks.

RE: LogShipping

Henrico Bekker — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:51:28 GMT

[quote][b]mohammed moinudheen (2/21/2011)[/b][hr][b]Not in Primary[/b] should also be correct.[/quote]Got it right, but was a bit confusing, as I agree that there are multiple correct answers.

RE: LogShipping

mohammed moinudheen — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:06:09 GMT

[b]Not in Primary[/b] should also be correct.

LogShipping

Pradyothana Shastry — Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:05:29 GMT

Comments posted to this topic are about the item [B]LogShipping[/B]