﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Discuss Content Posted by J.D. Gonzalez / Article Discussions / Article Discussions by Author  / Naming conventions / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:06:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Naming conventions</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic520671-220-1.aspx</link><description>I think is rigth having a convention to easily identify the function of tables in our DB, but I woul likke to see just a descriptive name when I work with the tables.It would be rigth to use a Schema instead a prefix ?Using a schema, we have a graphical separation of the tables when you look at the Object Explorer -&amp;gt; Tables tree in SQL Server Management studio, and the references to tables looks like this "REF.Promotions", I think this is more understandable for users trying to get information from the DB.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:35:07 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>jalekz</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>