InstantForum.NET v2.9.0SQLServerCentralhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/notifications@sqlservercentral.comSat, 25 May 2013 20:23:22 GMT20http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic799123-1511-1.aspxTalk about a disaster upon a disaster.Could have added that all backups have been erased.Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:59:48 GMTSQLRNNRhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic799123-1511-1.aspxFull proof plan!!! No doubt!!!!:w00t:Tue, 20 Sep 2011 01:42:14 GMTAnipaulhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic799123-1511-1.aspxAltough I was making fun of the cartoon I'll reply to you message in all seriousness.[quote]1. Is it feasible to have a disaster recovery?[/quote]While you might not be able to protect agaist everything there are reasonable precautions that should be taken.[quote]2. What if we lose all the digital things we have about our company?[/quote]There is more [b][i][u]money[/u][/i][/b] in the world than there is hard currency. If you are in the finacial side of things the data [b][i][u]is[/u][/i][/b] the reality.[quote]3. Do we have hard copy of our business data?[/quote]See point 2 above. Then you should see an office where a hurricane has hit. Happened to one of my customers. The electronic records came back in a few days when the power came back. The paper trail took over two months to reconstruct.Fire is a reality. It can take out your hard copy and your data at the same time.Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:09:14 GMTCharles Kincaidhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic799123-1511-1.aspxI get where you going Charles. I instead have few Questions.1. Is it feasible to have a disaster recovery? 2. What if we lose all the digital things we have about our company?3. Do we have hard copy of our business data?Based on the above other people think that it is easier to implement the easy way rather than trying to preventing something than is unlikely to happen.Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:05:51 GMTBudaClihttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic799123-1511-1.aspxCause and effect, folks. Cause and effect. Who knew that [b][i][u]this[/u][/i][/b] cause would have [b][i][u]that[/u][/i][/b] effect. Fire? And here I thought that vengeance was a dish best served cold. Hmm. We should look at the JOINS in Derek's query for the responses to challenges tables. Some thing is causing him to not return enough rows and fall right to this as the first choice for a response. Might the JOIN to POSSIBLE_BAD_OUTCOME_OF_ACTION have failed entirely?Is is just me or has any other person spotted the trend that Derek does not use contractions in his speech? Is it by design or just bad [b][i][u]Data[/u][/i][/b]? Say is ain't so!Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:18:05 GMTCharles Kincaidhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic799123-1511-1.aspxComments posted to this topic are about the item [B]<A HREF="/articles/Raw+Materials/68391/">Preparing for Disaster</A>[/B]Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:02:45 GMTgonickl