﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Administering / SQL Server 2005  / Hyperthread or not? / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:03:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Hyperthread or not?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1409234-146-1.aspx</link><description>Guess I was looking for that "easy" button.  We can test in production, on Sunday, but don't have a good tool to apply a typical business day load.    </description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 08:25:26 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Indianrock</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Hyperthread or not?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1409234-146-1.aspx</link><description>You've been around long enough to know "it depends" :-DIf HyperThreading is left on then I agree with keeping Max Degree of Parallelism below 32 in any conceivable scenario. If you were only considering the 32 physical cores when choosing 16 then great. But if you chose 16 after considering all 64 CPUs then I would drop it to 8.All stories about enabling and HyperThreading seem to be anecdotal at best. I have seen having it enabled help, hinder and make no impact at all. The only way to know will be to test with your workload.</description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 07:46:20 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>opc.three</dc:creator></item><item><title>Hyperthread or not?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1409234-146-1.aspx</link><description>We're still on sql 2005 enterprise 64-bit with plans to upgrade to 2012 later this year.  We have one main production database of about 2.5TB which gets a mix of OLTP and OLAP queries with read to write ratio of 3.6 -- about 3.6 reads for each write.  Netapp filer for storage.   Sql allocated 370GB of memory.Hyper-threading is active on our Dell Poweredge M910s ( active/passive cluster)    [b]Short of testing on production, any input on the value of having hyper-threading on.? [/b]  We're about to set a server-wide max degree of parallelism of 16 since we do see quite a few queries using up a lot of threads -- cxpacket waits.4 physical processors with 8 cores=32   64 Logical cpus with hyperthreadingOS Name:                   Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 EnterpriseOS Version:                6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601OS Manufacturer:           Microsoft CorporationOS Configuration:          Member ServerOS Build Type:             Multiprocessor FreeSystem Manufacturer:       Dell Inc.System Model:              PowerEdge M910System Type:               x64-based PCProcessor(s):              4 Processor(s) Installed.                           [01]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 47 Stepping 2 GenuineIntel ~2128 Mhz                           [02]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 47 Stepping 2 GenuineIntel ~2128 Mhz                           [03]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 47 Stepping 2 GenuineIntel ~2128 Mhz                           [04]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 47 Stepping 2 GenuineIntel ~2128 MhzBIOS Version:              Dell Inc. 2.3.0, 4/11/2011</description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:54:33 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Indianrock</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>