﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Administering / SQL Server 2005  / SQL 2008 R2 - CDC or Trigger / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:22:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: SQL 2008 R2 - CDC or Trigger</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1404462-146-1.aspx</link><description>Thanks Bhuvnesh, after reading http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.11.sql.aspx?pr=blog, I realized that both Change Tracking and Change Data Capture suck. Will rather use Trigger to collect changes to certain column/s in a table.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:17:24 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>kevin_nikolai</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: SQL 2008 R2 - CDC or Trigger</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1404462-146-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]kevin_nikolai (1/8/2013)[/b][hr]Both a trigger and cdc (change data capture) can be enabled to monitor changes to a table. When would you use each of them, which is best ?[/quote] see this [url]http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.11.sql.aspx?pr=blog[/url]</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:57:16 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Bhuvnesh</dc:creator></item><item><title>SQL 2008 R2 - CDC or Trigger</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1404462-146-1.aspx</link><description>Both a trigger and cdc (change data capture) can be enabled to monitor changes to a table. When would you use each of them, which is best ?</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:18:41 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>kevin_nikolai</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>