﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / Discuss Content Posted by Gregory Jackson / Article Discussions / Article Discussions by Author  / Why not RS? / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:19:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Why not RS?</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic445642-143-1.aspx</link><description>Excellent article.....covers all aspects of the ETL process and reasons why you chose what you did.  EXCEPT for the comment on Reporting Services.  Ha!  I'm really interested as to why you chose not to utilize RS 2005.  I'm in the beginning stages of implementing it in our organization and responsible for creating the "buy-in" on it.  Thanks! Emily</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:09:38 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>erutledge</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>