InstantForum.NET v2.9.0SQLServerCentralhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/notifications@sqlservercentral.comSun, 19 May 2013 08:21:55 GMT20http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic18649-134-1.aspxVery Informative article. Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:10:00 GMTsxnandwahttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic18649-134-1.aspxI would have to agree that the article is great. However, Oracle has a much better method of scaling out. Microsoft has admitted that they are not even close to achieving a true scale out solution, as was promised in Yukon. Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:10:00 GMTCharles Deatonhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic18649-134-1.aspxExcellent article. Wed, 03 Dec 2003 04:43:00 GMTEoin_BIhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic18649-134-1.aspxComplete article, that I don't doubt about it will be a greatful help for my SQL resarchs.Wed, 03 Dec 2003 01:50:00 GMTboussekeyhttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic18649-134-1.aspxHi there KumarGreat article mate and very informative.CheersCkChris Kempsterwww.chriskempster.comAuthor of "SQL Server 2k for the Oracle DBA"Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:55:00 GMTckempstehttp://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic18649-134-1.aspxComments posted to this topic are about the content posted at <A HREF=http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/kpart/scalingout.asp>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/kpart/scalingout.asp</A>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 GMTAnandSai