﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SQLServerCentral / SQL Server 2005 / SQL Server Newbies  / synchronization / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v2.9.0</generator><description>SQLServerCentral</description><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>notifications@sqlservercentral.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:39:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>If not intrested in replication you can use triggers and TSQL scripts in SQL jobs to keep your databases in sync.Though it would be good only if you are comfortable with TSQL.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:12:21 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>VaibhavChoubey@SQL</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>Make sure you don't have any conflicting primary keys.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:51:33 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Eswin</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>Thank u all</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:44:32 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>MJ-1115929</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>I would think that could work.  If you go down that path sit down and desing out your replication before you start trying to implement it though.  I have had much better experiences when I do this.CEWII</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:18:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Elliott Whitlow</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Elliott W (7/16/2009)[/b][hr]Transactional Replication perhaps?CEWII[/quote]Elliott,What about Merge replication for bi-directional synchronization. </description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:25:03 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Eswin</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>Transactional Replication perhaps?CEWII</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:25:35 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Elliott Whitlow</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]MJ (7/16/2009)[/b][hr]We need  bi- directional synchronization of the databases. Is any solution to synchronize two databases in the SQL server.[/quote]Can you have a look at peer to peer replication offered in sql server 2005's enterprize edition and see if it suits your requirement.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:24:55 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>ps.</dc:creator></item><item><title>synchronization</title><link>http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic754603-1291-1.aspx</link><description>Hi AllI need some  help to synchronize two MS SQL databases. The databases are located one in Local server and the other one in the web server.We need  bi- directional synchronization of the databases. Is any solution to synchronize two databases in the SQL server.I need some expert advicesThnx in advanceMilesh</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:16:49 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>MJ-1115929</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>