SQLServerCentral / Discuss Content Posted by Narayana Raghavendra / Article Discussions / Article Discussions by Author / The SQL Delete Statement / Latest Posts

RE: The SQL Delete Statement

Amulya Dutta — Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:27:00 GMT

The duplicate records delete query solved my issues.. thanks to the community..

RE: The SQL Delete Statement

Ron Sexton — Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:24:00 GMT

Thanks for sharing. It has potential. Perhaps also create the reverse to restore the records deleted as part of this. I know it is easy to just put them back in, just a thought.

RE: The SQL Delete Statement

currym — Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:18:00 GMT

Good idea and a neat approach. Thanks for sharing your work.

RE: The SQL Delete Statement

Raghavendra_Narayana — Wed, 23 Jul 2003 06:10:00 GMT

quote:
For the intended purpose TRIGGERS are the way to go without barely any effortAuthor: Intention is also to give leverage to Developer to Recycle only required records.

RE: The SQL Delete Statement

noeld — Wed, 23 Jul 2003 06:01:00 GMT

For the intended purpose TRIGGERS are the way to go without barely any effort

RE: The SQL Delete Statement

JohnWatts — Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:01:00 GMT

Great article! It's a very interesting approach that seems to have alot of possibilities.

The SQL Delete Statement

Raghavendra Narayana — Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:00:00 GMT

Comments posted to this topic are about the content posted at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/nraghavendra/thesqldeletestatement.asp