Jasmine D. Adamson - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:03 PM
Thanks, Jasmine. I had a "testing artifact" with an "x" in it in the code I posted and your the required call to the scalar function was commented out. I've repaired that in the code above.
Any chance of you posting that scalar function just to see if we can make any performance improvements to it without changing its function or interface?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.