John Hick-456673 (4/17/2015)
spaghettidba (4/17/2015)
craig 81366 (4/18/2013)
John Hick-456673 (4/18/2013)
I have tested it against large tables (1 billion plus rows) and performance is much better than with dynamic SQL.I'm going to be blunt here.
I find that extremely hard to believe.
+1
Dynamic SQL is difficult to beat in this case.
I would go as far as to say that suggesting this technique is a bad advice.
You are two years behind the eight-ball, there. But, thank you for playing. 😀
You might have missed that your article is featuring on the main page of SQL Server Central.
Still bad advice, even two years later.
-- Gianluca Sartori