In hindsight, I perhaps should have included another row in the sample. I didn't intend for it to imply that 1,2,3,3,4 was the result, but rather that this was the type of thing to return. I believe that the original idea was 1,2,3,3. I thought people might confuse this and think it was a typo, so I added another number.

I'll award back points and add another row to the results